52-year-old man with pink-yellow papules
|
|
![]() DiscussionSebaceous carcinoma Pathophysiology Even though the origin of ocular sebaceous carcinomas is well known (meibomian [tarsal], Zeis [eyelash], or sebaceous glands of the eyelid and caruncle), the origin of extraocular sebaceous carcinoma is less clear. The reports of sebaceous carcinoma arising within a nevus sebaceous and even in association with actinic keratosis or Bowen disease suggests that extraocular sebaceous carcinoma may originate from a pre-existing intraepidermal neoplasia, or that ultraviolet radiation plays a role in the pathogenesis of some of these tumors in sun-exposed areas. Studies have suggested a role for the Wnt/beta-catenin (a 92-kDa molecule involved in cell-cell adhesion in adherens junctions) pathway and the downstream target lymphoid enhancer binding factor-1 (LEF-1) in the pathogenesis of sebaceous carcinoma. Hypermethylation of the CDKN2A promoter region has also been found with high frequency in periocular sebaceous carcinoma occurring at a younger age. Epidemiology Sebaceous carcinoma is a rare tumor, with an estimated incidence rate of approximately 1 to 2 per 1 million per year. However, on the eyelid is the most common malignancy after basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma.
Regional lymph nodes are the most common site of metastasis, even though distant metastasis may involve the lung, liver, parotid gland, and bone. Microscopic features Hematoxylin and eosin shows neoplastic basaloid, basosquamous, or epidermoid cells with various degrees of differentiation, disposed in lobules or sheets of cells separated by a fibrovascular stroma. Well-differentiated tumors may contain sebocyte like cells with vacuolated, foamy cytoplasm. Sebaceous carcinoma usually stains negative for carcinoembryonic antigen, S100, HMB45, SOX10, CD5, GCDFP-15, D2-40, and Ber-EP4 (occasionally positive). Prognostic and molecular features
References 1. Owen JL, Kibbi N, Worley B, et al. Sebaceous carcinoma: evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(12):e699-e714. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30673-4. 2. Plaza JA, Mackinnon A, Carrillo L, et al. Role of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of sebaceous carcinoma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study. Am J Dermatopathol. 2015;37(11):809-21. doi: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000000255. 3. Roberts ME, Riegert-Johnson DL, Thomas BC, et al. A clinical scoring system to identify patients with sebaceous neoplasms at risk for the Muir-Torre variant of Lynch syndrome. Genet Med. 2014;16(9):711-6. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.19. 4. Sawyer AR, McGoldrick RB, Mackey S, et al. Should extraocular sebaceous carcinoma be investigated using sentinel node biopsy? Dermatol Surg. 2009;35(4):704-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01118.x. 5. Su C, Nguyen KA, Bai HX, et al. Comparison of Mohs Surgery and Surgical Excision in the Treatment of Localized Sebaceous Carcinoma. Dermatol Surg. 2019;45(9):1125-1135. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001780. 6. Tripathi R, Bordeaux JS. Impact of muir–torre syndrome on survival in patients with sebaceous carcinoma: A seer population-based study. Dermatol Surg. 2019;45(1):148-149. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001503. |
|