AACC educates on antibody testing for coronavirus and more

By LabPulse.com staff writers

April 30, 2020 -- With testing in the spotlight during the COVID-19 pandemic, the American Association for Clinical Chemistry (AACC) has created educational videos explaining serology, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) diagnostics, and more.

The Making Sense of Coronavirus Testing video series tackles topics repeatedly coming up during politicians' press briefings and in the general media, such as why it's difficult to get a test for COVID-19 and how antibody tests should be used. AACC President Carmen Wiley, PhD, addresses challenges labs are facing with supplies needed for testing and President-elect David Grenache provides a review of how antibody tests work, noting that they are not useful when people are recently infected but rather many days or weeks later.

In separate but related news, the AACC also published an article by lab experts explaining the use of antibody tests and how they should be validated (Clinical Chemistry, April 28, 2020).

Manufacturers don't need to do much to bring products to the market -- they are only required to let the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) know that they plan to do so -- and quality and accuracy have come into question. There has been a dramatic increase in the number of available tests, mostly from companies "with little to no track record in the in vitro diagnostic market," wrote Christopher Farnsworth, PhD, and Dr. Neil Anderson, both of Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, in Clinical Chemistry.

In fact, more than 100 companies have notified the agency of plans to offer a serology test and few have secured an emergency use authorization (EUA), they noted.

"This represents an unprecedented release of manufacturer-developed laboratory tests that have not been reviewed by the FDA," Farnsworth and Anderson wrote. "Some have appeared in [nonpeer-reviewed] preprint servers and have both gained attention and generated criticism in the lay press."

The authors explained appropriate use and best practices for labs in validating products.

"Given the lack of scientific rigor regarding the assessment of available serologic assays, it is a necessity that the laboratory community provide thorough examination of these methods and clearly articulate to providers their utility," Farnsworth and Anderson wrote.

White House coronavirus testing blueprint puts states in driver's seat
The White House has released a blueprint for coronavirus testing that outlines the responsibilities of states with support by the federal government,...
Opening the magic box: Lab professionals reveal their value during COVID-19
The COVID-19 pandemic has brought clinical laboratory professionals out of obscurity and into the limelight. American Association for Clinical Chemistry...
AACC responds to reports of bad blood tests for coronavirus
The American Association for Clinical Chemistry (AACC) has acknowledged problems with some commercial serology tests for the novel coronavirus, while...
USPSTF: Pregnant women may not need vaginosis screening
Pregnant women not at risk for preterm delivery don't need to be screened for bacterial vaginosis if they are not showing symptoms of the condition, according...
Can the reality of coronavirus antibody tests live up to hype?
It's easy to see the appeal a rapid antibody test for the novel coronavirus would have in the imagination of the general public. Results come in a matter...

Copyright © 2020 LabPulse.com

Last Updated np 5/4/2020 1:10:08 PM

Subscribe Today
Do you want to be a Microbiology Insider?

When LabPulse gets hot new information, our Insiders are the first to find out. Stay current in today's competitive market by receiving our exclusive free email updates.

Yes, Keep Me Current